From a suburban newspaper:
I like it: security guards to keep the rattle-brains out of the park.
Nothing like the 8 year old though, who lost a hand to a dog bite. She put her hand through a gap in the fence....oops. Spot the owner negligence?
Dog-lovers of the moronic variety have a fair dose of contempt for the rights of non-dogs. This blog is to help you resist such suburban dog pests (no argument with well-controlled dogs) and maintain your safety and peace.
Thursday, September 3, 2015
Saturday, July 25, 2015
Monday, September 23, 2013
Injured by dog
Doesn't blame the owner! That's just the person to blame. So the rule is: as soon as a dog approaches you off leash crush its ribs.
Monday, August 19, 2013
Dog throws
Always interested in techniques to disable dogs. And here's one, mixed in with crazy Jewish history. Only, I think it would work on your pet, but unlikely on a cranky dog!
Thursday, August 15, 2013
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Dog owner done!
In the Sydney Morning Herald this morning: dog-moron gets done!
A man has been charged by police after his pet dog allegedly attacked and killed a cat in Sydney's east.
Police allege the Pitbull-Staffordshire Terrier cross was unmuzzled and not on a leash when it attacked the cat, which was in the front yard of its home, in Matraville on Thursday.
Several people saw the attack and alerted police, and detectives from the Eastern Beaches local area command arrested the 32-year-old dog owner at his home in Matraville on Tuesday.
The man was with his pet dog at the time of the attack but police say he did not restrain the animal correctly. Pitbull-Staffordshire Terriers are subject to restricted dog rules that require them to be muzzled and on a leash at all times when in a public place.
The dog owner was charged with four offences under the Companion Animals Act, including being in charge of an uncontrolled dangerous dog in a public place.
He was granted conditional bail to appear in Waverley Local Court on February 2.
Police are liaising with Randwick City Council about the destruction of the dog.
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Sustagen and the law
Dear sir,
I've just seen your advert on TV, the one with the dog running ahead of its handler. I note that the dog is off leash, which is against the law, except in a designated off leash area. I wouldn't want to think that you either broke the law in filming the advert, or endorse this noxious middle class habit of ignoring dog laws, to the endangerment and discomfort of many children and elderly.
If you did break the law, I suggest that you forward the fine to the Office of State Revenue. It is $1100 for having a dog off a leash in public.
I've just seen your advert on TV, the one with the dog running ahead of its handler. I note that the dog is off leash, which is against the law, except in a designated off leash area. I wouldn't want to think that you either broke the law in filming the advert, or endorse this noxious middle class habit of ignoring dog laws, to the endangerment and discomfort of many children and elderly.
If you did break the law, I suggest that you forward the fine to the Office of State Revenue. It is $1100 for having a dog off a leash in public.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



